Should the death penalty be abolished?

Side one

Retain for the gravest crimes

Some crimes are so grave that only the ultimate penalty meets justice and deters others.

Hobbes: Order and the State · Kautilya: The Arthashastra · Bentham: Greatest Happiness
Side two

Abolish it

Mistakes are irreversible, deterrence is unproven and the poor are more likely to be executed. Justice should reform, not take life.

Gandhi: Truth and Nonviolence · Kant: Duty and Dignity · Mandela: Reconciliation
Common ground

Both want justice for victims and safety for society.

How to reconcile them

Focus on certainty of punishment, faster trials and victim support, which deter more than severity.

When each side is right

Use retentionist arguments for rare, extreme cases. Use abolitionist arguments on error, bias and dignity.

Which side are you on?Vote in the app, see what others picked, and explore the debate with AI.

Open in the app